Evaluating variation in pre-operative evaluation and planning for children undergoing atrial or ventricular septal defect repair.

BACKGROUND: CHD care is resource-intensive. Unwarranted variation in care may increase cost and result in poorer health outcomes. We hypothesise that process variation exists within the pre-operative evaluation and planning process for children undergoing repair of atrial septal defect or ventricular septal defect and that substantial variation occurs in a small number of care points. METHODS: From interviews with staff of an integrated congenital heart centre, an initial process map was constructed. A retrospective chart review of patients with isolated surgical atrial septal defect and ventricular septal defect repair from 7/1/2018 through 11/1/2020 informed revisions of the process map. The map was assessed for points of consistency and variability. RESULTS: Thirty-two surgical atrial septal defect/ventricular septal defect repair patients were identified. Ten (31%) were reviewed by interventional cardiology before surgical review. Of these, 6(60%) had a failed catheter-based closure and 4 (40%) were deemed inappropriate for catheter-based closure. Thirty (94%) were reviewed in case conference, all attended surgical clinic, and none were admitted prior to surgery. The process map from interviews alone identified surgery rescheduling as a point of major variability; however, chart review revealed this was not as prominent a source of variability as pre-operative interventional cardiology review. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variation in the pre-operative evaluation and planning process for surgical atrial septal defect/ventricular septal defect patients was identified. If such process variation is widespread through CHD care, it may contribute to variations in outcome and cost previously documented within CHD surgery. Future research will focus on determining whether the variation is warranted or unwarranted, associated health outcomes and cost variation attributed to these variations in care processes.

The Effect of Steroids on Prenatally Diagnosed Lung Lesions.

BACKGROUND: Open fetal resection for large lung lesions has virtually been replaced by maternal steroid administration. Despite this paradigm shift, little is known about the effects steroids have on lung lesion growth in utero. METHODS: A 10-year retrospective review of all prenatally diagnosed lung lesions cared for at our fetal care center was performed. We evaluated the effects of prenatal steroids on congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM)-volume-ratio (CVR), distinguishing change in CVR among CPAMs, bronchopulmonary sequestrations (BPS), and bronchial atresias. We also correlated fetal ultrasound and MRI findings with pathology to determine the accuracy of prenatal diagnosis. RESULTS: We evaluated 199 fetuses with a prenatal lung lesion. Fifty-four (27 %) were treated with prenatal steroids with a subsequent 21 % mean reduction in the CVR (2.1 ± 1.4 to 1.1 ± 0.4, p = 0.003). Fetuses with hydrops and mediastinal shift who were treated with steroids rarely had resolution of these radiographic findings. Postnatal pathology was available for 91/199 patients (45.7 %). The most common diagnosis was CPAM (42/91, 46 %), followed by BPS (30/91, 33 %), and bronchial atresia (14/91, 15 %). Fetuses who received steroids and had pathology consistent with CPAM were more likely to have a reduction in their CVR (p = 0.02). Fetal ultrasound correctly diagnosed the type of lung lesion in 75 % of cases and fetal MRI in 81 % of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatally diagnosed CPAMs are more likely to respond to maternal steroids than BPS or bronchial atresias. Knowing the diagnosis in utero could aid to steward steroid usage, however, fetal imagining modalities are not perfect in distinguishing subtype. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.